What is the actual difference at runtime between doing
config.webxml.booter = :merb
and
config.webxml.booter = :rack
in the warble.rb file?
Currently, I'm using :merb. Should I be using :rack, or would that only
make sense if I were dealing with a non-Merb, non-Rails app.?
Thanks,
Wes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
on 19.08.2008 19:09
on 19.08.2008 19:21
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote: > make sense if I were dealing with a non-Merb, non-Rails app.? Basically, yes. You might be able to get Merb working with the :rack booter and a canned Merb rackup file, but I haven't tried it. /Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
on 19.08.2008 19:42
Nick Sieger wrote: >> in the warble.rb file? >> Currently, I'm using :merb. Should I be using :rack, or would that only >> make sense if I were dealing with a non-Merb, non-Rails app.? >> > > Basically, yes. You might be able to get Merb working with the :rack > booter and a canned Merb rackup file, but I haven't tried it. > What is the point of doing that? Why is it better (if it is)? Wes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
on 19.08.2008 20:12
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote: >>> > > What is the point of doing that? Why is it better (if it is)? Dudley Flanders wrote most of the Merb booter. The upside is less configuration and better adaptation to the servlet environment -- Merb environment is booted, logger gets redirected to appserver log, session are bridged to the java servlet sessions. /Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
on 19.08.2008 20:48
Nick Sieger wrote: >>>> >>> booter and a canned Merb rackup file, but I haven't tried it. >>> >>> >> What is the point of doing that? Why is it better (if it is)? >> > > Dudley Flanders wrote most of the Merb booter. The upside is less > configuration and better adaptation to the servlet environment -- Merb > environment is booted, logger gets redirected to appserver log, > session are bridged to the java servlet sessions Not to be dense, does "upside" mean the upside of the Merb booter or the Rack booter? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
on 30.08.2008 23:28
Wes Gamble wrote: >> Dudley Flanders wrote most of the Merb booter. The upside is less >> configuration and better adaptation to the servlet environment -- Merb >> environment is booted, logger gets redirected to appserver log, >> session are bridged to the java servlet sessions > Not to be dense, does "upside" mean the upside of the Merb booter or the > Rack booter? Upside refers to the merb booter. In order to support Rack, we have to "generalize" the objects provided by the servlet API a bit more, so there's a potential they'll be a bit slower as a result (in comparison to the app-specific booters. - Charlie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email